 Reviews Hankook VENTUS V12 EVO K110
|
|
|
|
| Average based on 11 completed reviews |
Ø   | Score
[1.96] |
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
  |
[1.1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1.2]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
 |
[2.2]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[2.2]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[2.7]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[1.7]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[1.9]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[1.8]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[2.7]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
13.591 km |
|
|
Rate Performance:
: Top marks for tire performance in this category.
: Tire performance is unacceptable in this category.
|
|
Add own review
Read all English reviews
|
|
|
|
| 07.05.2010 from MJP |
Ø | Score
[2.60] |
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
|
[3]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[3]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[-]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[4]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[4]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[4]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[3]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
1.000 km |
|
Tire size and vehicle make
275 / 40 R18 V
Chevrolet Corvette
|
Would you purchase this tire again? don't know
Comments
I really don't have any idea of the wet or snow performance on these tires. I put an arbitrary score to fill the survey. I also don't know how they wear as I did not keep them long enough to find out. The survey does not allow me to fill the correct tire sizes for front and back either so that's also incorrect. I ordered these tires because I read good reviews about them and they price was very good. Unfortunately these are not run- flat and since I drive a Corvette, I was afraid I'd get a flat and I would be in a world of hurt. There is no way to jack it up to change the tire and it would be damaged when pulled up on a flat bed even without a flat tire... Anyway, I drove them for a few hundred miles and sold them after purchasing the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S run- flat tires. The Hankooks did handle extremely well in dry pavement and stopped equally well. They were however, quite harsh riding and very noisy as well. In the short time I drove them I did not notice any wear. they looked new when I sold them. If my car would not require run- flat tires, I would have kept them. However, after driving the Michelin Pilot Sports A/S run flats, I must say that the Hankooks did not compare well with the Michelins. Not because the Hankooks are bad, but because the Michelins are so very excellent. The handling, stopping and tracking of the Michelins is outstanding in all types of weather. The ride is incredibly more comfortable and the road noise is practically nill. Additionally, they are a run- flat tire. To be fair, they cost almost double the price of the Hankooks. But in my case there was no contest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[4]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[1]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[2]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[2]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[2]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
27.500 km |
|
Tire size and vehicle make
215 / 50 R17 ZR
CITROEN GRAND C4 PICASSO
|
Would you purchase this tire again? definitely
Comments
TRES BON RAPPORT QULAITE PRIX.ILS FERONT AU MOINS LE MEME KILOMETRAGE QUE LES MICHELIN MONTES AUPARAVANT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28.12.2009 from nofear |
Ø | Score
[1.80] |
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[3]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[1]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[1]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[1]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[5]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
15.000 km |
|
Tire size and vehicle make
225 / 45 R18 ZR
fiat croma 1.9 td
|
|
Would you purchase this tire again? definitely
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20.12.2009 from capellini |
Ø  | Score
[1.50] |
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[3]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[2]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[3]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[1]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[1]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
20.000 km |
|
Tire size and vehicle make
205 / 50 R17 ZR
Rrenault Mégane 2
|
|
Would you purchase this tire again? probably
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Traction under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Braking under dry conditions |
|
[1]
|
| Traction under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Braking under wet conditions |
|
[2]
|
| Traction in snow |
|
[-]
|
| Ride comfort |
|
[1]
|
| Noise level (internal) |
|
[1]
|
| Noise level (external) |
|
[1]
|
| Tire wear |
|
[2]
|
| Kilometers driven on tyres |
10.000 km |
|
Tire size and vehicle make
245 / 35 R18 ZR
Audi TT
|
|
Would you purchase this tire again? definitely
|
|
|
|
1 - 2 - 3
The average rating is calculated as follows:
- Traction under dry conditions 15%
- Braking under dry conditions 15%
- Traction under wet conditions 15%
- Braking under wet conditions 15%
- Traction in snow 0%
- Ride comfort 10%
- Noise level (internal) 5%
- Noise level (external) 5%
- Tire wear 20%
|
|
|
Tires: remoulds, brand name tires, own brands with great value for money
|
|
